A software engineer screen should establish whether the candidate has genuinely built and shipped software, can reason about trade-offs, and communicates clearly with non-engineers. It is not the place for algorithm puzzles; those belong in a technical round with an engineer.
Last reviewed 2026-09-10
Listen for: Concrete personal ownership ('I designed the API, I wrote the migration') rather than 'we' throughout.
Listen for: Honest reflection, understanding of the trade-off, and what they learned.
Listen for: A systematic approach: reproducing, narrowing scope, forming hypotheses, using logs or tooling.
Listen for: Awareness of tests, code review, risk, and business context; not perfectionism or recklessness.
Listen for: Clear communication without jargon; adjusts to the audience.
Listen for: Values feedback, keeps reviews small, separates style from substance.
Listen for: Argues with data and respect, commits once a decision is made.
Listen for: Calm triage, communication with stakeholders, and a blameless post-mortem mindset.
Listen for: Self-awareness and an honest map of strengths and gaps.
Listen for: Specific, recent examples rather than generic 'I read blogs.'
Listen for: Motivations that match what the role actually offers.
Listen for: Curiosity about how the team works, quality, and product impact.